Previous month:
October 2020
Next month:
December 2020

November 2020

The woman who was passed over by the Noble committee for Al Gore!

 

update:  Irene Died since this was first published in July 2013 at 98 years old- never getting her Noble prize!

image from encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.comBob Barney-We are re-running this story because you must WAKE UP! This woman was passed over by the Noble Peace Committee in favor of AL GORE, the crook that is trying to rob your hard earned dollars in a global warming tax scheme hoax! Now Donald Trump has asked the Committee to remove his prize! We say, give it to the rightful person--Irena Sendler! 


The Holocaust - the systematic annihilation of six million Jews - is a history of enduring horror and sorrow. The charred skeletons, the diabolic experiments, the death camps, the mass graves, the smoke from the chimneys ... In 1933 nine million Jews lived in the 21 countries of Europe that would be occupied by Germany during the war. By 1945 two out of every three European Jews had been killed by the Nazis. 1.5 million children were murdered. This figure includes more than 1.2 million Jewish children, tens of thousands of Gypsy children and thousands of handicapped children.

Yet there were acts of courage and human decency during the Holocaust - stories to bear witness to goodness, love and compassion. This is the story of an incredible woman and her amazing gift to mankind. Irena Sendler. An unfamiliar name to most people, but this remarkable woman defied the Nazis and saved 2,500 Jewish children by smuggling them out of the Warsaw Ghetto. As a health worker, she sneaked the children out between 1942 and 1943 to safe hiding places and found non-Jewish families to adopt them. For many years Irena Sendler - white-haired, gentle and courageous - was living a modest existence in her Warsaw apartment. This unsung heroine passed away on Monday May 12th, 2008. Her achievement went largely unnoticed for many years. Then the story was uncovered by four young students at Uniontown High School, in Kansas, who were the winners of the 2000 Kansas state National History Day competition by writing a play Life in a Jar about the heroic actions of Irena Sendler. The girls - Elizabeth Cambers, Megan Stewart, Sabrina Coons and Janice Underwood - have since gained international recognition, along with their teacher, Norman Conard.

Continue reading "The woman who was passed over by the Noble committee for Al Gore!" »


Who Said This?

By Bob Barney

Trolling Facebook, I often laugh at the NEVER TRUMPERS who love to poke fun of the stupidity of Donald Trump.  Yet the stupid guy, turned the smartest guy in the world Obama's economy around in 1 week!  But just to keep things even who said the following dumb things. All were either presidents, or would be pretenders to the throne...

1

1). I am a Jelly Donut (when speaking German to a Berlin Crowd)

2.) She announced that her secretary of education would have to be approved first by a child “trans person.”

3.) "Who is that?" Looking at a bust of George Washington... He was Veep at the time.

4.) "I've now been in 57 states? I think one left to go."  Running 4 Prez

5.). "A man I'm proud to call my friend. A man who will be the next President of the United States—Barack America!"

6.) “Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.” 

7.) Since we know only Trump talked dirty in the WH, who said this? "I want loyalty! I want him to kiss my ass in Macy’s window at high noon and tell me it smells like roses. I want his pecker in my pocket.”

8.) What Prez “took a crap, then shaved and showered, all the while continuing his conversation as though what he was doing was the most normal thing in the world.”

9. "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." and "That depends on what the meaning of 'is' is."

10.) "I've looked on a lot of women with lust. I've committed adultery in my heart many times."

11.) “I don’t know what the fuck to do about Vietnam.”

12.) "You know, I always wondered about that taping equipment but I'm damn glad we have it, aren't you?"

13.) "Who is going to find out? These women are trash. Nobody's going to believe them." 

14.) "I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the president."

15.)   "At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you c*nt." 

16.) "R-S-P-E-C-T." --flubbing the spelling of Aretha Franklin's famous song "Respect" 

17.) "But she is a typical white person, who, if she sees somebody on the street that she doesn't know, you know, there's a reaction that's been bred in our experiences that don't go away and that sometimes come out in the wrong way, and that's just the nature of race in our society."

18.) "There's just no such thing as truth when it comes to him. He just says whatever sounds good and worries about it after the election."
Presidential candidate Bill Clinton describing his opponent, George Bush (Quoted in the American Spectator, 10/28/92) 

19.) "the purpose of government is to rein in the rights of the people"

20.) “I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races … I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races from living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

 

 

ANSWERS!

 

Continue reading "Who Said This?" »


HEADLINES & STORIES FROM AROUND THE WORLD: Week-43 2020

1.theplaintruth.jpg
HEADLINES & STORIES FROM AROUND THE WORLD: Week-43
2020
Nov 1-7

Continue reading "HEADLINES & STORIES FROM AROUND THE WORLD: Week-43 2020" »


They Say Too Close to Call- Let the Election Fraud Begin!

Bob Barney

 

ELECTION COVERAGE

 Last night I was watching Virginia elections rather close.  Locally Made, Scott Taylor and Benjamin had huge leads (and so did Trump) until the last 3% of counted votes.  In that 3%, they all los, and lost big!   Taylor for example was up 20,000 with 3% to go, and evidently lost every single vote in that last 3%....

As for the nation, America has really shown that I was totally wrong with my prediction for the 3rd time now.  Many Americans honestly love planneddemics, lockdowns, fake Corona Deaths and a shut down economy.  We are closer than ever to a Civil War.

Winners:  Kamala Harris will probably be elected President

   Biden- Harris will be president- he will be declared either senile or indited by her supporters in the Deep State

  Democrats

   China

   RINO never Trumpers

   Abortionists

   Communist everywhere

   Deep State

   Big Business, Big Media and Big Tech

   Evil

Losers:

   Joe Biden-- soon to become a victim of the left-'This is my son, Beau, who a lot of you helped elect to the Senate': Joe confuses his two granddaughters and then introduces one of them as his dead son - and he could be President in HOURS... 

  American People

  American workers

  Small Business

  JOBS

  Infants in the womb

  Elderly

  Blacks, Hispanics and women - all will be left in poverty to insure they vote Democrat

  Your Health and healthcare

 

 

   


What do Liberals Hate so Much about Donald Trump and Richard Nixon?

By Bob Barney

 Before Trump, there was Richard Nixon. image from gopthedailydose.com   There are very few names that draw the ire of liberals more than Richard Nixon and Donald Trump. The absolutely hate their guts. The question I have is why?  What is it about Richard Nixon or Donald Trump that they hate so much?  I am going to devote a very few short paragraphs on what could be the reasons they are hated so much by liberals.

NIXON:

Wage and Price Freeze:

     Inflation was beginning to raise its ugly head in 1972.  The Vietnam war was winding down, and the economy was in trouble. Nixon, a man most conservatives of the day hated, implemented a wage and price freeze in a vain effort to stop the inflationary spiral.  It was pure Keynesian economics, something liberals to this day believe in and a view that conservatives hate.  It has proven to be a dismal failure, which I believe Ronald Reagan and John Kennedy both proved.  When faced with the economic woe of inflation, Nixon did not go the Kennedy route of slower taxes and supply side economics, he followed the liberal line started by the British economist John Maynard Keynes during the Great Depression in his 1936 book, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.  Keynesian economists often argue that private sector decisions sometimes lead to inefficient macroeconomic outcomes which require active policy responses by the public sector, in particular, monetary policy actions by the central bank and fiscal policy actions by the government, in order to stabilize output over the business cycle.[3] Keynesian economics advocates a mixed economy – predominantly private sector, but with a role for government intervention during recessions. Keynesian economics served as the standard economic model in the developed nations during the later part of the Great DepressionWorld War II, and the post-war economic expansion (1945–1973), though it lost some influence following the oil shock and resulting stagflation of the 1970s.[4] The advent of the financial crisis of 2007–08 caused a resurgence in Keynesian thought,[5] which continues as new Keynesian economics.

    Nixon was quite liberal in his view of economy.  The hated "conservative" Nixon behaved more like Barack Obama, than Ronald Reagan.... Obviously, Nixon's economic policies cannot be the reasons liberals hate him....

Vietnam:

     Probably no war in the history of America was more hated by the public than the Viet Nam war. Liberals especially hated it and marched on the streets against it.  The nation was in turmoil and the war was adding to the turbidity of the times.  Nixon, like Barack Obama, ran on ending the war.  Unlike Obama, who has not yet ended the wars in the middle east after 8 years, Nixon kept his promise and virtually ended the war in his first 4 years.  Obviously, Nixon's Viet Nam policies cannot be the reasons liberals hate him....

EPA:   

      Liberals have forever warned that capitalist America was going to ruin the environment and destroy the world.  In the 1970's, the worry was actually GLOBAL COOLING!  Liberals wanted the government to get involved. Conservatives did not want this, as they knew that the government can do almost anything right.  Nixon again sided with the liberals and formed the notorious EPA, which has wrecked havoc on American Industry... Obviously, Nixon's environmental policies cannot be the reasons liberals hate him....

Watergate:

      Up until Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, I would say that most liberals claimed that they hated Richard Nixon because of his criminal acts in Watergate.  Early in the morning of June 17, 1972, several burglars were arrested inside the office of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), located in the Watergate building in Washington, D.C.  They were looking into to ties between the communist (in Cuba) and the Democratic party.  It's amazing how even then, the democrats were filled with communist and communist money! Most historians admit they are not sure whether Nixon knew about the Watergate espionage operation before it happened, he took steps to cover it up afterwards, raising “hush money” for the burglars, trying to stop the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) from investigating the crime, destroying evidence and firing uncooperative staff members. In August 1974, after his role in the Watergate conspiracy had finally come to light, the president resigned.

    Nixon, as it turned out did nothing to coverup his problem compared to Obama and Hillary Clinton.  In the greatest irony of the entire affair, Hillary As a 27 years old staff attorney for the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate investigation, was fired by her supervisor, lifelong Democrat Jerry Zeifman for unethical behavior. When asked why Hillary Rodham was fired, Zeifman said in an interview, “Because she was a liar. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer, she conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the Committee, and the rules of confidentiality.”  I realized that the main stream media has reported this.    

Carl Bernstein—half of the reporting duo that helped exposethe Watergate scandal in 1972—went on CNN to volunteer an observation about Hillary Clinton's failure to release the transcripts of her paid speaking gigs at Wall Street firms. "Now, you've got a situation with these transcripts," he said, "a little like Richard Nixon and his tapes that he stonewalled and wouldn't release."

"Whoa, whoa," interrupted CNN anchor Poppy Harlow. "I mean, your investigation brought down a presidency. You know scandal."

"Whoa" is an appropriate reaction. It's safe to assume that the transcripts of those speaking gigs would be a mild embarrassment for Clinton, who is trying to prove that she would take on Wall Street as president. Most people do not predict that the transcripts will implicate Clinton in a vast criminal conspiracy—as the tapes that had recorded all of Nixon's Oval Office conversations confirmed about him.

Bernstein is not the only person bringing up Watergate to describe Clinton. His partner-in-exposing-crime, Bob Woodward, is also fond of comparing Clinton to Nixon. Woodward, who appears often on Fox News shows to discuss Clinton's recent travails—her appearance before the House Select Committee on Benghazi, controversial donations to the Clinton Foundation, the investigation into her use of a private email server as secretary of state, and her refusal to release transcripts of her Wall Street speeches—has on multiple occasions given into the temptation to talk about Watergate.   Obviously, Nixon's Watergate Scandal cannot be the reasons liberals hate him....

TRUMP:

Trump has been more conservative in many aspects than Richard Nixon, so on the surface, one could see why liberals dips him, but then again.  Black unemployment has never been so low, along with women in the workforce and the increase in the poorest American's wages.  Trump has pardoned more people of color in jails than any president.  He stood up to NAFTA and China, something that the unions claimed they always wanted.

Although he has reduced the power of the IRS and EPA, they are still running amok.  He hasn't built a wall on the southern border. Again Obama build more wall than Trump has.  He has not even deported 1/2 the amount of illegals as Obama did. Remember, contrary to the news media, Trump did not put children in cages, Obama did!  

Trump even foolishly listened to liberal, Hillary supporting scientist like Dr. Fauci and shut the nation down! Pure liberal dogma!   Yet he has no credit from those he tried to help.

The Answer!

So what could the reason be that liberals hate Richard Nixon and Donald Trump so much, and still love Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama or molester Joe Biden?   I think the reason is obvious.  The only reason liberals hate them are they have an "R" after their names. They love Hillary and company only because she has a "D" after her name. Liberals have no causes that they truly believe in. They are liars!  Liberals today are merely democrats, and stand for no real cause other than the democrat candidate no matter what they do or believe!

 COMING NEXT MY ARTICLE CALLED:

You are not a liberal - Your a Democrat! AND You're not a conservative - You're a Republican!

Look for it soon on ThePlainTruth.com


God's Calendar for November

Calendar for November 2020 (United States)

NOV2020

SUN

MON

TUE

WED

THU

FRI

SAT

01

God's Mo and Day-8:17

02

8:18

3

8:19

4

8:20

5

8:21

6

8:22

7

8:23

             

8

God's Mo and Day-8:24

9

8:25

10

8:26

11

8:27

12

8:28

13

8:29

14

8:30

             

15

9th

Month

Day 1

16

9:2

17

9:3

18

9:4

19

9:5

20

9:6

21

9:7

             

22

God's Mo and Day-9:8

23

9:9

24

9:10

25

9:11

26

9:12

27

9:13

28

9:14

             

29

God's Mo and Day-9:15

30

9:16

         
             
           

 

             
 
Phases of the Moon: 8:3Q 15:N 21:1Q 30:F

 


My Prediction Trump will win easily


Screen Shot 2020-10-30 at 1.26.29 PM

Up until Barack Obama, my predictions for the presidency were quite accurate, going all the way to 1976 (wrong only in the 92 election).     
Back in 1976, I wrote a thesis in college on how a psychological condition known as cognitive dissonance, could explain elections in America. It was based on the theory (named cognitive dissonance), which in simple terms simply meant that people in their own life's conflicts, switch drastically like a pendulum on a clock from left to right.   After tragedies or other traumatic events occur in their lives, most people try to "get back to normal" but never can.

Cognitive dissonance was first investigated by Leon Festinger, arising out of a participant observation study of a cult which believed that the earth was going to be destroyed by a flood, and what happened to its members — particularly the really committed ones who had given up their homes and jobs to work for the cult — when the flood did not happen.

While fringe members were more inclined to recognize that they had made fools of themselves and to "put it down to experience," committed members were more likely to re-interpret the evidence to show that they were right all along (the earth was not destroyed because of the faithfulness of the cult members).

Festinger's (1957) cognitive dissonance theory suggests that we have an inner drive to hold all our attitudes and behavior in harmony and avoid disharmony (or dissonance). This is known as the principle of cognitive consistency.

When there is an inconsistency between attitudes or behaviors (dissonance), something must change to eliminate the dissonance.  Notice that dissonance theory does not state that these modes of dissonance reduction will actually work, only that individuals who are in a state of cognitive dissonance will take steps to reduce the extent of their dissonance.

The theory of cognitive dissonance has been widely researched in a number of situations to develop the basic idea in more detail, and various factors that have been identified which may be important in attitude change.

With this in mind, my theory was this same phenomenon applies to nations, and especially nations like America with free elections. In my theory I predicted that America always looked for balance between liberalism and conservatism.    However, when we go into the voting booth--- we tend to actually choose candidates that are on the very left, or very to the right!  This is the cognitive dissonance theory as applied to nations in the same way it is applied to people. Hollywood, is full of movies based on cognitive dissonance:  It's like the old time movie theme's based on this effect where the whore who becomes the nun... The crooked politician who becomes the honest politician...  And stories with a hero or heroine swap from one extreme to another.

With that background out of the way, I would normally project as I did in 2016, that the election would be a change election and that America would radically shift back away from globalism, Obamaism and crooked Washington politics.  So in a normal year, Donald Trump should win as did Ronald Reagan back in 1980.
 
My Prediction Trump will win easily:
     I guess many would conclude now that with my theory, Biden should win easily in a landslide, but I think that is not the case.  People swing back and forth from left to right after YEARS of agony.  I suggest, although many do not like Trump, they will see that under Trump their lives were more "normal" and thus better than under Obama, or George Bush.
 
Don't forget, Donald Trump is ten times more popular with a great minority of Americans than Richard Nixon ever was. Nixon, was probably the most distrusted and hated president in recent memory.  He wasn't likable, even by those who thought he was a very good president!  Nixon, like Trump barely won the 1968 election (the nation was tiring of Vietnam, but the "swing" against the war had not fully evolved) but by 1972, won in the largest landslide in history, a record that still is unbroken. Not even Ronald Reagan beat Nixon's landslide.  By 1972, the nation was in "dissonance" and fully rejected the very liberal, socialist Democratic Party.   People held their noses and voted for Nixon.
 
I believe that the great "swing" started in 2016, like the 1968 election, and this year will be the full swing.....  If I am right, Trump will not only win, he will win big.   States that should normally vote "D" will switch to Trump.   Why?  COVID!   That's right, it's the Democrats locking down their states that will lead to a radically swing in the election.  People not in a balanced state. Suicides, depression, and anger is at all time highs causing stress, and these people have that inner drive to hold all our attitudes and behavior in harmony and avoid disharmony (or dissonance). I believe these people will vote Trump.  
 
I also believe that the Republicans will take the house and keep the Senate.....
 
I may be very wrong about when the "swing" happens, but truly doubt it. 
 
AMERICA IS FOUND IN the Bible and WE WILL FALL TO COMMUNISM SOMEDAY:
No matter what happens Tuesday, be aware that God has already predicted the end of American freedom and being enslaved by the aliens living among us.  This is going to happen! 

When we read the Bible, which was written about 2,000-3,000 years ago, we often don't get the "feel of it" and how it relates to what is going on today, especially when reading prophecy about the end times and which nations are going to be involved. We read about Israel, of course, as well as Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Ethiopia and a list of unrecognizable nations and names. Yet what about nations like  China, Russia, Germany, Italy, England or the United States? Why aren't they mentioned in our Bible?  How can it be, if the Bible is the word of God, that he didn't know that these modern nations would exist? After all, if God knows the future, didn't God know about the United States or Europe or China? How can we trust prophecy or understand it when most of the time the scenario just doesn't fit what we know about the world today? Is there going to be another Assyrian Empire as the Bible claims? Does Assyria even exist today? Is Greece going to be the most powerful nation under another Alexander the Great as the book of Daniel suggests? It doesn't seem very likely to me and I am sure not to most of you either. Are we indeed living in the end times and how can we know what to look for and what today's news means? Will the world as we know it really ever end, as Jesus foretold?

Believe it or not, the Bible is as current and relevant today as the day when it was first written. The fact is that it is even more relevant today because much of what was predicted by the prophets was meant for today and beyond and not for the time these men were living! The hard-to-pronounce nations mentioned in the pages of prophecy written so ,long ago still exist, and you can prove it to yourself! God has given us tools to understand His predictions for our world and has had uncanny accuracy that nobody could ever duplicate without divine influence. God has rightly predicted:
the fall of Babylon

 The fall of Assyria

 The fall of Alexander

 The fall of Rome 7 times (it has now fallen five or six times depending on what expert you believe!)

 The Pope

 Radiation poisoning

 Chernobyl by name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 Global man-made pollution
 
 the Muslim religion and their fight with Europe known as Crusades and the final yet to come conflict between these two powerful regions

 The rise of England and the USA to be two most powerful nations ever to exist on this planet!

 That England would have a monarchy, and that monarchy would claim to be David's descendants and that they would sit on his literal throne over the same rock that David himself was coronated over.

 The #13 would be important to the United States of America and that our form of government would be by election and not by a divine monarchy from the line of David.

 The increase in knowledge all within the span of one generation. Has there ever been an increase of knowledge since the foundation of the world to equal 1930-2050 (taking the Biblical 120 years as the generation of a man)

 Worldwide famine and diseases unlike ever to have occurred in the history of the world

 A great false Christianity that would rule the world when at the time predicted, the name of Christ was known but by few people on earth and that knowledge could actually get you killed!

 That Jerusalem would always be the center of world conflict... Name any other city in the world that always been in the center of world conflict? Name any city? This prophecy concerning Jerusalem was made over 2500  years ago!
 
 That mankind would never live longer than 120 years old. Has modern science been able to change this fact told to us by God 4,000 years ago?

 African slavery, and also a blessing to black people!

 Communism as a "new" form of government that would fool and sweep throughout the world, except Muslim nations.

These are the predictions that God has made and most have already come true and the fact of their accuracy cannot be honestly intelligently disputed. So what about the future? What does the Bible and God have to say about what is still yet to happen. To understand, we must be able to identity the nations of the Bible and who those people are today and where they live. You will see that the major nations of today are indeed the same nations called by different names in the pages of God's word.

OUR FUTURE:
Believe it or not, if you believe in the Bible, then you must also believe in God's prophecies.  Concerning the USA, and all Anglo-Saxon nations of the world, we are destined into captivity and destruction.  This will happen.  When it will happen, I have no idea. But to understand this better read my articles: America in Biblical Prophecy   and

Revealed: how Associated Press cooperated with the Nazis

Times never really change, today all social media, news organizations and Democrats are in bed with Chinese propaganda.  Take a look at history repeating itself....  

The Associated Press news agency entered a formal cooperation with the Hitler regime in the 1930s, supplying American newspapers with material directly produced and selected by the Nazi propaganda ministry, archive material unearthed by a German historian has revealed.

When the Nazi party seized power in Germany in 1933, one of its first objectives was to bring into line not just the national press, but international media too. The Guardian was banned within a year, and by 1935 even bigger British-American agencies such as Keystone and Wide World Photos were forced to close their bureaus after coming under attack for employing Jewish journalists.

Associated Press, which has described itself as the “marine corps of journalism” (“always the first in and the last out”) was the only western news agency able to stay open in Hitler’s Germany, continuing to operate until the US entered the war in 1941. It thus found itself in the presumably profitable situation of being the prime channel for news reports and pictures out of the totalitarian state.

In an article published in academic journal Studies in Contemporary History , historian Harriet Scharnberg shows that AP was only able to retain its access by entering into a mutually beneficial two-way cooperation with the Nazi regime.

The New York-based agency ceded control of its output by signing up to the so-called Schriftleitergesetz (editor’s law), promising not to publish any material “calculated to weaken the strength of the Reich abroad or at home”.

This law required AP to hire reporters who also worked for the Nazi party’s propaganda division. One of the four photographers employed by the Associated Press in the 1930s, Franz Roth, was a member of the SS paramilitary unit’s propaganda division, whose photographs were personally chosen by Hitler. AP has removed Roth’s pictures from its website since Scharnberg published her findings, though thumbnails remain viewable due to “software issues”.

The ​Nazi party booklet ‘The Jews in ​the USA’
Pinterest
 The Nazi party booklet ‘The Jews in the USA’ used an AP photograph of New York mayor Fiorello LaGuardia. Photograph: AP

Continue reading "Revealed: how Associated Press cooperated with the Nazis" »